|
|
BEST PRACTICES:
Success stories on benefit-sharing
measures
In the South, policies on benefit sharing - if
any - are provided in laws and regulations on access to biological resources,
sometimes in legislation on the protection of biological diversity, and - in
the case of India - in its plant variety protection law. Countries with
legislation on indigenous peoples' rights often include provisions on benefit
sharing in these laws, which then also cover indigenous farmers. Despite all
these efforts, so far there have been no examples of direct benefit sharing
between providers and receivers of plant genetic resources for food and
agriculture resulting from such legislation.
There are, however,
other ways of sharing benefits, which are mostly not provided for in
legislation, and often implemented by or through NGOs. Farmers generally
participate more or less in the sharing of non-monetary benefits. In the
international stakeholder survey carried out in 2005 (Andersen, 2005), the most
frequently mentioned non-monetary benefits were:
access to seeds and propagating material, and related
information
participation in the definition of breeding
goals
participatory plant breeding in collaboration between
farmers and scientists
strengthening of farmers' seed
systems
conservation activities, including local gene
banks
enhanced utilization of farmers' varieties, including
market access
The 2005 survey showed that - for many reasons - benefit
sharing is more promising when the point of departure is the farming
communities that actually contribute to the maintenance of plant genetic
diversity.
Read more:
Creating incentive
structures from the ground in the Philippines
Community seed fairs in
Zimbabwe
Community gene banking and on-farm
conservation in India
Dynamic Conservation and Participatory
Plant Breeding in France
Participatory plant breeding adding
value in Nepal
Capacity-building for seed potato
selection in Kenya
The Peruvian Potato Park
Rewarding best
practices in Norway |
Top
 |
|
|
In this
section:
|

  |
|