|
|
Options
for realizing Farmers' Rights
There are many barriers to
the realization of Farmers' Rights, but there are also many options for
removing these barriers and promoting the rights of farmers. Here we will
highlight some central options, taking the identified barriers to the
realization of Farmers' Rights as points of departure.
Read more
about:
Options for upholding and developing legal
space
Options for creating incentive, reward
and recognition mechanisms
Options for
enabling farmers' participation in decision-making
Options for
upholding and developing legal space
One specific measure would be
to review legislation and draft legislation affecting Farmers' Rights with a
view to upholding or creating legal space. From a Farmers' Rights perspective,
the main goal must be to uphold the legal space for farmers within these
emerging legislative frameworks. As a minimum, farmers must be allowed to save,
develop, exchange and sell seeds and propagating varieties from their
varieties, i.e. traditional varieties as well as varieties developed by
farmers, with other farmers. Plant-health concerns must be addressed in other
ways. Furthermore, intellectual property legislation must be designed so as to
enable small-scale farmers to continue their customary practices related to
seed and propagating material. Finally, access legislation must not impose
barriers to conservation activities, or serve to discourage seed exchange among
farmers.
Read more:
How to realize legal space for Farmers'
Rights
Examples
of best practices of realizing legal space for Farmers' Rights
Options for creating incentive,
reward and recognition mechanisms
Again a review of incentive
structures within the agricultural policy would be a good point of departure.
Here the aim would not necessarily be to change the incentives for large-scale
production and the use of commercial varieties, but rather to ensure that there
are compensating measures that ensure incentive structures also for farmers who
conserve and sustainably use plant genetic resources for food and agriculture.
Such incentive structures could include extension services to support farmers,
loans on favourable conditions for the purchase of farm animals and other
required input factors, facilitation of the marketing of products from diverse
varieties, etc.
In terms of reward systems and benefit sharing, there
are already many small-scale initiatives, such as the establishment of
community gene banks, participatory plant breeding, farmers' field schools, and
various marketing activities. Today, these benefits are achieved mostly through
initiatives taken by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Intergovernmental
Organizations (IGOs) and some extension services, and they reach only a limited
number of farmers. Options for scaling up activities relevant in the context of
benefit sharing range from establishing national-level funding mechanisms to
channel the necessary resources (partly from international sources) to
activities supporting farmers in their maintenance of agro-biodiversity. This
would also require up-scaling institutional structures and expertise for these
purposes - in close collaboration with farmers.
To enable such
up-scaling, international co-operation is probably required. It will take time
for the benefit-sharing mechanism of the International Treaty as well as its
Funding Strategy to become effective, and we cannot know for sure how much
funds they may generate. Thus it is important to find other sources as well. A
potential that has so far not been systematically tapped is Official
Development Assistance (ODA). Some funds have been directed to in situ
management of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture through the
Global Environment Facility (GEF), and some funds have been channelled through
bilateral donor agencies and NGOs. But there is no systematic approach to
tapping this potential. If the importance of Farmers' Rights for poverty
eradication and the UN Millennium Development Goals could be sufficiently
highlighted - in addition to the general commitment of the Contracting Parties
to international co-operation and technical assistance in the International
Treaty - then more funds could probably be released for this purpose.
To
ensure recognition of farmers and farming communities, more thought should be
given to how seed registries are developed and whether there could be some sort
of remuneration for farmers who register their seeds. Awards for innovative
farmers could also be considered. In addition it is important to create systems
that make farmers feel safe from misappropriation of their seeds. Work is in
progress on this in several countries, particularly in Peru, so perhaps we can
have some models in the near future.
Read more:
How to create
such mechanisms in the context of Farmers' Rights to participate equitably in
benefit sharing
Examples of
best practices in the context of Farmers' Rights to participate equitably in
benefit sharing
How to create such mechanisms in the context of Farmers'
Rights to protection of traditional knowledge
Examples of
best practices in the context of Farmers' Rights to protection of traditional
knowledge
Options for enabling farmers' participation in
decision-making
In a democracy, participation in decision-making at
the national level means taking part in decision bodies, in hearings regarding
legislation and policies, and in the institutions that provide services to
farmers, like research bodies and extension services. It also means taking part
in discussions in other arenas, such as the media.
It is vital that
farmers' organizations ensure legitimate processes for finding and selecting
the people who are to represent farmers and their mandates. To enable such
processes, awareness rising, capacity building and information work among
farmers are all of crucial importance.
Read more:
How to enable
farmers' participation in decision making
Examples
of best practices farmers' participation in decision making |
Top
 |
|
|
In this
section:
|

  |
|